![]() The gtx780 has 384bit while the k4000 has 192. The bus width makes the biggest difference in rendering performance. ini, so that premiere and AE will recognize your card. The CUDA performance of that card will blow the doors off the k4000. With this system, and for this work with the today's current development of these cards which one to choose? Also i will work with Photoshop and Capture One. I will work with Premiere Pro and After Effects (for compositing). ![]() In future I get a second SSD (for Raid 0) and 2 more HDD 2TB (For Raid 5) As Raid Controller will use that of Motherboard. Monitor: no 10bit color (in future may to buy one) ![]() The rest of my system (It will works in overclocking mode) With the money it can avail i buy Quadro K4000 or GeForce GTX 780ti In the recent ( here ) winner is again the GTX's, with top GTX TITAN. In former ( here ) winner is the GTX's, with top GTX 680. I looked carefully and relatively benchmark's. The addition of a K4000 to such a system will nonetheless yield a powerful digital content creation and design machine, whether it’s 3D modeling or high-resolution video editing the compute power provided by this card will seriously improve performance and productivity.I have read many articles on the internet starting from this Its low-power consumption, single slot design and the need for only one 6-pin power connector means that it can go into workstations that have components that are not necessarily top-end, high power units. The K4000 needs to be viewed from the perspective of pro-grade cards and when seen from that angle it’s an absolute steal at about $800 retail. Have a look at our article on the difference between desktop and workstation GPUs for more information. ![]() Although there may be consumer cards with seemingly higher performance for much lower prices these are not comparable to something like the Quadro K4000. Let’s have a look at some of the numbers for the K4000:ĭon’t forget that, like every other Quadro card, the K4000 enjoys the same additional layer of QA and support from Nvidia as well as finely-tuned drivers that are optimized for professional applications such as Maya, Solidworks, AutoCAD and the like. Any workstation with an open PCI-E 16x slot can take one of these cards without fear of width issues, although of course you should check if the case is long enough. ![]() The K4000 is also relatively compact thanks to its single-slot cooler design. One omission from the K4000’s feature set is SLI, which means that direct multi-GPU configuration is impossible, but of course for CUDA processing it should be possible to use a second card without SLI to give a performance boost in applications that support it. Additionally, since the new Kepler architecture is so power efficient (max power consumption is a frugal 80W), the K4000 offers a staggering power per Watt figure. Even when compared to the next card in line, the K5000, the performance gap isn’t that great. In terms of price versus performance no other workstation-grade card offers this much value. In terms of performance it stands toe-to-toe with the Quadro 5000 from the previous generation Fermi architecture while costing half as much. The Kepler-based K4000 is just such a card. In the desktop space we saw this in 2007 with the release of the G92-based Nvidia Geforce 8800GT, which was a mid-range part with performance so good that it brought the relevance of much more expensive cards into question. The K4000 represents that rare confluence of technology and business that sees the release of a mid-range part that seem as if they belong with more expensive products in their range. 07-22-2014 The Quadro K4000 is one of those watershed hardware releases that really makes you go “What were they thinking?” in the back of your head. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |